Health And Health Care Disparities - 1102 Words

Health Health Care Disparities throughout the Region Plaquemines Parish The leading causes of death of residents in Plaquemines are heart disease and cancer. In addition, 15.6% of residents have been diagnosed with diabetes compared to the 12.3% state rate. Diabetes was identified as a community health issue, particularly among the uninsured, Black residents, and those living at the southern end of the parish. Also, 40.8% of residents are considered obese compared to the state rate of 31.7% Other health disparities include mental health, depression, and anxiety. Availability of health care is an important factor in determining a community’s health care disparities. Components include health insurance coverage, number of health care professionals in the area, and proximity to health care resources. In Plaquemines Parish, the percentage of uninsured children is higher than the state rate. 7.3% of children are uninsured compared to the state rate of 6.4%. However, the percentage of uninsured adults is lower than the state rate. 13.4% of adults are uninsured compared to 25.5% that are uninsured in the state. Compared to the state rate of 18.9%, 22.6% of resident in Plaquemines were unable to see a doctor due to a cost. Furthermore, a higher percentage of White and Non-Hispanic have mental health coverage compared to Non-White and Hispanic residents. Stakeholders identified a lack of behavior health, oral health, primary care and pediatric services. Low SES residents in theShow MoreRelatedHealth Disparities And Health Care895 Words   |  4 Pagesethnic health needs, including culture norms, religious mandates, and health disparities. The health disparities refers to specific differences in disease incidence, health outcomes, quality of health care and access to health care services that exist across racial and ethnic groups (Mandal, 2014). Disparities may result from inadequate access to care, poor quality of care, cultural issues and social determinants. Health Policy Issues Disparity Despite improvements, differences persist in health careRead MoreHealth Disparities And Health Care1015 Words   |  5 PagesHealth disparities are present in our health care system. Whether it be racial, educational, or environmental, these disparities exist and are detrimental to health care outcomes. While there have been recent advancements in how to eliminate or reduce these disparities, there is still a major inequity in health care for all individuals. This paper will include definitions of health equity and health inequity, steps to reduce health inequity, and two important decisions used to decrease in healthRead MoreHealth Disparities And Its Impact On Health Care1508 Words   |  7 Pagesarray of health issues that is associated with it. A variety of issues that could come with a multicultural society could include, but not limited to: health disparities, access to healthcare, getting equal and quality care, and cultural appropriation. Likewise, there are factors involved that prevents people of minority groups from gaining access to the health care they need like a language barrier or no health insurance. One of the major factors involved that prevents access to proper health careRead MoreHealth Disparities And Health Care For Minorities917 Words   |  4 Pagesto worse care for minorities is an article from U.S News world report on the website http://health.usnews.com/health-news/patient-advice/articles/2016-02-11/racial -bias-in-medicine-leads-to-worse-care-for-minorities. In this article, the experience of a medical doctor is used to shed light on the subject of racial bias/ discrimination in health care and how it is affecting health outcome of racial and ethnic minority. â€Å"Race or ethnic group is a major social factor that influences health in the URead MoreBarriers And Disparities Of Health Care826 Words   |  4 PagesBarriers and Disparities in Healthcare Barriers to healthcare include factors that restrict or hinder people from receiving adequate and quality health care service. Health care disparities are those differences that negatively affects less advantaged group (Mehta, 2014). Health care barriers play a significant role in comprehending causes of disparities. This paper will discuss the obstacles and disparities that exist and affects healthcare. Barriers that Exist and Affected Healthcare FinancialRead MoreBiases And Health Care Disparities1222 Words   |  5 PagesBiases and Health Care Disparities between the Black and White Communities Amy Raddatz Denver School of Nursing â€Æ' Biases and Health Care Disparities Between the Black and White Communities A notable discrepancy exists between health care received by the black population in comparison to the white population. However, the foundation of health care inconsistencies has yet to be firmly established. Instead, conflicting views prioritize causes of health care disparities as due to social determinantsRead MoreHealth Disparities Of Prenatal Care960 Words   |  4 PagesOne important health disparity is the lack of prenatal care amongst women in socially disadvantaged populations. These predominately include women of minorities, women who have a low income, and the location these women live in. This health disparity is important to address because research has shown that women who receive prenatal care are more likely to conceive babies of a healthy birth weight and have low infant mortality rates than those women who do not receive this prenatal care (Putting WomenRead More Racism and Health Care Disparity Essay1324 Words   |  6 PagesIs Racism the cause of Health care disparity? In recent discussions of health care disparities, a controversial issue has been whether racism is the cause of health care disparities or not. On one hand, some argue that racism is a serious problem in the health care system. From this perspective, the Institute of Medicine (IOM) states that there is a big gap between the health care quality received by minorities, and the quality of health care received by non-minorities, and the reason is due toRead MoreEssay on Barriers and Disparities in Health Care893 Words   |  4 PagesBarriers and Disparities in Health Care NUR/550 June 8, 2012 Cynthia Holsen R.N. – C.W.H.N.P. Barriers and Disparities in Health Care Everyone should have the opportunity to achieve a healthy life and have comprehensive health care services available to them. To achieve this healthy life, people need to have access to the health care system and to a health care provider with whom they can develop a trusting relationship. However, existing barriers to attaining health care services oftenRead MoreRacial And Ethnic Disparities Of Health Care2282 Words   |  10 Pages Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Health Care Ksenia Bruner University of St. Francis Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Health Care Introduction Although the United States is a leader in healthcare innovation and spends more money on health care than any other industrialized nation, not all people in the United State benefit equally from this progress as a health care disparity exists between racial and ethnic minorities and white Americans. Health care disparity is defined as â€Å"a particular

Outbound Investment Tax Issues In Australia â€Myassignmenthelp.Com

Question: Discuss About The Outbound Investment Tax Issues In Australia? Answer: Introducation As per the ATO (Australian Taxation Office, the FBT (Fringe benefit tax) is the tax that is paid by the employers on payment of few benefits that they offer to the employees. it includes the family of the employees and other associates. These benefits are paid as additional to or as part of the employees wages or salaries. For instance, the benefits received by the director of a trust or company will be subject to FBT. The treatment of FBT is different from the income tax and the FBT is computed on taxable value of fringe benefit that is provided (Dunne, Mason and Patto 2014). Person liable to pay for FBT Any person or employer who offers any fringe benefit to his employee or the associate of the employee with respect to his employment is required to pay for FBT. The employee for whom the employer is required paying the FBT may be the past, present or future employee or the director of the trust or company. Further, the person will be liable to pay FBT even if benefit is delivered to the associate of his employee or by any third party under the agreement with the person (Boccabella 2015). Loan benefit The situation of loan fringe benefit takes place while the employer provide the loan to any employee with zero interest rate or with minimal interest rate that is lower as compared to statutory interest rate. However, the term loan is quite large, for instance, when an employee owes an amount of debt to the employer but the employer does not enforce the payment while the debt become due, the amount remain unpaid will be treated as loan or where the loan is made to the employee that allows payment of interest that is less than six month frequent, the unpaid amount will be treated as separate loan at the end of every six month with zero interest rate (Somers and Eynaud 2015). Computation of Fringe benefit tax for Brian As per TR 93/6 taxation ruling, any person can avail the benefit of tax offsetting on on the interest payment of loan taken from various banks or financial institutions. Further, as per the ruling the taxpayer is not required to have profits from any other sources to make such payments. Therefore, if the bank facilitates Brian with the interest payment option at year closing, he will not be liable for payment of interest to bank. Further, if bank releases Brian from interest repayment, he will not be liable to pay tax. As per the case study of MC. Donald Vs FC of T, it was held that for the stated property Mr. Mc Donald was entitled to 25% of profit and Mrs. Mc. Donald was entitled to 75% of profit. However, in case of loss, the entire loss will be borne by Mr. Mc Donald. The main issue in the case was whether the operating loss shall be shared as per the agreement or it shall be shared in equal proportion. After the occurring of loss, the taxpayer claimed that the loss will entirely borne by Mr. Mc. Donald as per the agreement (Gordon 2016). However, the ATO contended that in the 1st place there were no partnership as per the general law and the relevant relation that was existed in the agreement was of the nature of co-ownership. The reason behind that was as per the law the tenants were joint and were in equity, the occurring of loss through letting out the properties shall be equally shared with respect to the consequence that the respondent will be allowed for only half of the loss (Edmonds an d Raghavan 2017). Finally, the private arrangement between the partners regarding sharing of profits or losses will not over-ride or change the respective entitlements under the income tax. Therefore, as per the principal establishment of Mc. Donald case Jack will be able to deduction for only half of the total loss that is ($ 10,000*50%) = $ 5,000. Thus, Jill and Jack are required to share loss amounted to $ 10,000 equally. Further, on selling instance, any arising capital loss or capital gain will be shared by Jill and Jack personally and the partnership level here will not be considered. Moreover, the capital gain, if any, will not be added to net income of partnership. However, that will be included to the income of each partner to the level of interest in the property. The case of IRC v Duke of Westminster (1936) based on the case of tax avoidance. As per the case, one gardener was employed by the dyke, who was paid from the post-tax income of Duke. However, for the purpose of tax chargeability, he stopped paying the gardener rather prepared another agreement for paying him the same amount. As per the taxation ruling, this enables Duke to claim deduction from his taxable income that reduced his income tax liability (Freedman 2016). However, this case state that each person is entitled to plan his tax as per his preference or requirement and no person can be enforced to pay higher amount of tax. The relevance of the case in Australia states that any person has the choice of transaction for through which the taxpayer achieves the benefit of the asset is the matter of him; he will be entitled to select that option of the transaction that will be subject to the tax or subject to less tax as compared to others (Evans 2015). As per the fact of the case Stanton v FCT (1955), the taxpayer was a grazier and he had some balance of timber with him. He entered into the agreement with saw miller who agreed for paying him lump sum on the basis of the timber amount that was standing in the land. However, amount was quarterly payable and independently became due irrespective of the fact that the timber was removed and cut or not. However, as per the courts verdict the taxpayer was not assessable on the payment as it was not the payment for royalty. However, if the case of Mc Cauley v FCT (1944) is taken into consideration, it was stated that the grazier was dealing with the timber for lump sum amount and it was just a matter to him irrespective of the fact that the purchaser came or cut it or not. However, the payment was with regard to the right for cutting g the timber and based on the time they wre engaged to do it (Wallace, Hart and Evans 2013). From the discussion of above two cases it is identified that the case of Mc Cauley v FCT (1944) will be applicable to Bill as the right for cutting the timber is the proprietary right as the lands owner. Further, the payment was not for timber rather it was for the right of cutting and removing the timber. The case of Stanton v FCT (1955) will not be applicable here as the word payment is expressed under this case as the amount of payment shall be calculated based on the value or quantity upon which rights are exercised. Therefore, taking into consideration the outcomes of the above cases, it is concluded that in 1st case the received amount of Bill will be taxable under income tax. However, in the 2nd case the received amount of Bill will be considered as royalty. Reference Boccabella, D., 2015. Reconciling the Overlap of Charging Provisions in Regard to Non-Cash Benefits from Employment, Personal Exertion and Business.J. Austl. Tax'n,17, p.85. Dunne, J., Mason, J. and Patto, J., 2014. 2013 cases show high ATO success rate.Taxation in Australia,48(8), p.429. Edmonds, M. and Raghavan, R., 2017. Outbound investment tax issues.Taxation in Australia,52(3), p.162. Evans, S., 2015. It's' Clean Hands' Again: The Dirtiness of Not Paying Tax Considered in the Supreme Court. Freedman, J., 2016. General Anti-Avoidance Rules (GAARs)A Key Element of Tax Systems in the Post-BEPS Tax World? The UK GAAR. Gordon, R., 2016. Increasing use of tax-transparent entities by private groups due to BEPS.Tax Specialist,19(4), p.136. Somers, R. and Eynaud, A., 2015. A matter of trusts: The ATO's proposed treatment of unpaid present entitlements: Part 1.Taxation in Australia,50(2), p.90. Wallace, M., Hart, G. and Evans, C., 2013. An evaluation of the contribution of Justice Hill to the provisions for the taxing of capital gains in Australia.Austl. Tax F.,28, p.123.